LONDON.- While in the modern day most people will either bury or cremate their dead, some of our ancestors did things a little differently.

Gough’s Cave is a well-known palaeolithic site in south-eastern England. Nestled in the Cheddar Gorge, the cave is perhaps best known for the discovery of 15,000 years old human skulls shaped into what are believed to have been cups and bones that had been gnawed by other humans.

But were the people living in Gough’s Cave a gruesome outlier, or where they actually part of a wider cannibalistic culture of northern Europe? A new paper now suggests that they were not alone. Human remains dating to the same time period from across northern and western Europe and attributed to the same culture, known as the Magdalenian, also show evidence that they were cannibalised. This suggests that the eating of the dead was a shared behaviour during the late Upper Palaeolithic.

Dr Silvia Bello is an expert on the evolution of human behaviour working at the Natural History Museum and was part of this latest study published in Quaternary Science Reviews.

‘Instead of burying their dead, these people were eating them,’ explains Silvia. ‘We interpret the evidence that cannibalism was practiced on multiple occasions across north-western Europe over a short period of time, as this practice was part of a diffuse funerary behaviour among Magdalenian groups.’

‘That in itself is interesting, because it is the oldest evidence of cannibalism as a funerary practice.’

This cannibalistic behaviour was seemingly fairly common amongst Magdalenian people of north-western Europe, but it didn’t last particularly long. There was a shift towards people burying their dead, a behaviour seen widely across south central Europe and attributed to a second distinct culture, known as the Epigravettian.

This then raises the question of whether the eventual relative ubiquity of burial culture towards the end of the Palaeolithic was the result of Magdalenian people adopting primary burial as a funerary behaviour, or if their population was replaced.

Cannibalism as funerary behaviour

During the late Upper Palaeolithic, between around 23,000 and 14,000 years ago, there were two dominate cultures in western Europe, largely distinguished by the stone and bone tools the crafted.

The Epigravettian culture was mainly found living in south and eastern Europe, and buried their dead with graves goods in a way that we would perhaps consider more usual by modern standards. The Magdalenian culture from the north-west of Europe, however, were doing things differently. They were processing the bodies of their dead, removing the flesh from the corpse, eating it, and in some cases modifying the remaining bones to create new objects.

One of the main questions was whether or not this cannibalism was driven by necessity, when perhaps food was scarce or the winter long and so the people responsible were in survival mode, or whether it was a cultural behaviour.

Evidence from Gough’s Cave already suggests that the eating of the bodies there was of a more ritualistic form. This is because there is ample evidence that the people responsible were hunting and eating lots of other animals, such as deer and horses, while the careful preparation of some of the human remains like the skull cup and an engraved bone show that some was thought was being put into the cannibalism.

Dr William Marsh is a researcher at the Natural History Museum who has been studying the human remains that have been found in Gough’s Cave for his PhD.
‘To contextualise Gough’s Cave better, I reviewed of all the archaeological sites attributed to the Magdalenian and Epigravettian Upper Palaeolithic culture,’ explains William. He was able to find 59 sites across Europe from this time which had human remains, of which 13 showed evidence of cannibalism, 10 of burial and two that showed combined evidence of burial and cannibalism. What he realised was that the practice of eating the dead was fairly localised, being found at sites across western and central Europe and up into the UK.

‘The fact that we find cannibalism being practiced often on multiple occasions in over a short period of time, in a fairly localised area and solely by individuals attributed to the Magdalenian culture, means we believe this behaviour was one that was performed widely by the Magdalenian, and was therefore a funerary behaviour in itself,’ says William.

In this context, the eating of the dead can be seen as different in practice, but perhaps not meaning, to cremations, burials or mummification.

Changing funerary practices

Building on this, William and Silvia were then able to look at whether any genetic analysis had been done on the human remains from these sites. This would enable the researchers to see if there were any links between who was practicing which funerary behaviours.

Remarkably, the genetic evidence seems to suggest that the two groups practicing different funerary behaviours were genetically distinct populations. All the sites from which evidence of cannibalism has been found show that the people were part of a genetic group known as ‘GoyetQ2’, while all of the more ordinary burials were of people who belonged to the ‘Villabruna’ genetic group.

While both groups were living in Europe at the same time, individuals showing GoyetQ2 ancestry are associated with the region spanning the French-Spanish border, whilst Villabruna ancestry was carried by individuals who inhabited the Italian-Balkan region. This implies that when the practice of eating the dead ended and more conventional burials became common place in north-western Europe, it wasn’t through a spreading of ideas but rather Epigravettian people replacing the Magdalenian.

‘At this time, during the terminal period of the Palaeolithic, you actually see a turnover in both genetic ancestry and funerary behaviour,’ explains William. ‘The Magdalenian associated ancestry and funerary behaviour is replaced by Epigravettian associated ancestry and funerary behaviour, indicative of population replacement as Epigravettian groups migrated into north-western Europe.’

‘We believe that rather than being an example of transcultural diffusion, the change in funerary behaviour identified is an example of demic diffusion where essentially one population comes in and replaces the other population.’

Interestingly, this mirrors how researchers believe farming arrived in the UK some 6,000 years later.

Questions still remain about the funerary practices of these ancient humans. For example, William and his colleagues are now trying to can figure out whether these cannibalised humans were related to one another, or whether they were eating people from outside their immediate groups.